🔗 Share this article

When I am a Dungeon Master, I historically avoided heavy use of randomization during my D&D adventures. My preference was for story direction and session development to be shaped by deliberate decisions rather than random chance. However, I chose to alter my method, and I'm very glad I did.

The Catalyst: Watching 'Luck Rolls'

An influential actual-play show features a DM who frequently calls for "chance rolls" from the participants. He does this by picking a type of die and assigning possible results contingent on the number. It's at its core no different from using a pre-generated chart, these are devised on the spot when a character's decision has no predetermined resolution.

I opted to test this approach at my own session, primarily because it seemed engaging and provided a change from my normal practice. The results were remarkable, prompting me to reconsider the often-debated balance between pre-determination and randomization in a roleplaying game.

A Memorable Story Beat

At a session, my party had survived a city-wide conflict. When the dust settled, a player asked about two beloved NPCs—a brother and sister—had survived. In place of picking a fate, I asked for a roll. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. I defined the outcomes as: on a 1-4, both died; on a 5-9, a single one would die; a high roll, they survived.

The player rolled a 4. This resulted in a profoundly moving sequence where the characters came upon the bodies of their friends, forever clasped together in death. The group conducted last rites, which was especially meaningful due to prior story developments. As a final gesture, I decided that the forms were miraculously restored, showing a magical Prayer Bead. I randomized, the item's magical effect was perfectly what the group needed to address another critical quest obstacle. It's impossible to script such serendipitous coincidences.

Honing DM Agility

This event made me wonder if improvisation and making it up are actually the core of tabletop RPGs. While you are a detail-oriented DM, your improvisation muscles may atrophy. Adventurers often take delight in ignoring the most detailed narratives. Therefore, a skilled DM needs to be able to pivot effectively and invent content in real-time.

Utilizing on-the-spot randomization is a great way to develop these skills without venturing too far outside your preparation. The key is to deploy them for low-stakes situations that won't drastically alter the campaign's main plot. As an example, I wouldn't use it to decide if the king's advisor is a traitor. But, I would consider using it to determine if the party arrive moments before a key action takes place.

Empowering Player Agency

Luck rolls also helps keep players engaged and create the impression that the game world is responsive, evolving based on their actions in real-time. It prevents the perception that they are merely characters in a DM's sole narrative, thereby enhancing the collaborative nature of roleplaying.

This philosophy has historically been part of the original design. Original D&D were reliant on charts, which fit a game focused on treasure hunting. Although modern D&D tends to emphasizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, this isn't always the required method.

Achieving the Healthy Equilibrium

Absolutely no problem with thorough preparation. But, equally valid nothing wrong with letting go and allowing the dice to decide some things instead of you. Control is a major factor in a DM's responsibilities. We need it to manage the world, yet we often struggle to cede it, even when doing so can lead to great moments.

My final recommendation is this: Have no fear of relinquishing a bit of the reins. Embrace a little improvisation for minor story elements. It may create that the unexpected outcome is far more powerful than anything you might have planned by yourself.