🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her audience decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants experienced positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."